Archive for Lean Marketing
LabWorks Opens On the Lean Marketing Lab
Posted by: | CommentsThe virtual community of the Lean Marketing Lab open its doors (gateway) on Monday. November 21, 2011. This online community was created to further the cause of bringing continuous improvement to the sales and marketing community. The foundational work is in Lean but you will find a flavor of Service Design and Design Thinking intertwined. Now, the paid membership section LabWorks Group has also opened for training and consulting. The presentation below describes the offer..
So before you buy the books above or enroll in a Business901 program check out the special offers that are provided for being a member of the group.
Related Information:
Lean Marketing Lab Opens!
Start with Journey Mapping vs Value Stream Mapping
It’s not about the things we make, it’s how we use the things we make
GE CMO sheds her view on Design Thinking
Does Lean need to move beyond Deming?
Posted by: | CommentsThe Agile Minds Group in Belgium recently held a conference on Lean Software Development. The speakers were a few of my favorite podcast guests such as Jim Benson , David Anderson
and Don Reinertsen.
Don is always entertaining and has such a way with explaining statistics that he makes himself difficult to argue with. This time he took on Dr. Edward Deming and for most of us it would seem to be an overwhelming task. Deming – loyalist should understand that Don makes his case outside of manufacturing. He questions if precise optimization is toxic in product development or knowledge work. Such as:
- Is preventing problems always better than correcting them?
- Should we really try to eliminate as much variability as possible?
- Does responding to normal variation make performance worse?
- Did Deming understand Kanban?
- Is 3 Sigma upper and lower control limits correct for you?
In this presentation, Don Reinertsen discusses the limitations of Deming’s ideas and how to go beyond them.
Don Reinertsen – Is It Time to Rethink Deming? from AGILEMinds on Vimeo.
I would consider myself a Deming Loyalist. However, I do agree with Don on many of his points. It is the evolution of Lean that is being discussed. As we apply Lean outside of manufacturing many of the basic assumptions that we tie to Deming and Lean may not be valid. Following the principles of John Boyd’s, OODA Loop for a better prescription may open the doors for Lean to prosper outside of traditional process thinking.
An example of this is The Lean Startup where if you review the first writings of Eric Ries you will see the influence of not Deming but The OODA Loop and Don Reinertsen. When you look at the my outline for Lean Sales and Marketing, it follows a similar pattern. It concentrate on the Demand side of the business which requires and encourages variation. It requires placing economic value as part of statistical control. It requires us to look at Lean with a fresh set of eyes!
You gotta like a guy that stirs the pot. Thanks Don!
Related Information:
Why the Lean SALES PDCA Cycle was Created!
Deming was just simply wrong about variation…
Why won’t Lean commit to the Demand Chain the way it committed to the Supply chain?
Lean Marketing: Sales Quotas lead to Waste
Understanding Variation: The Key to Managing Chaos
Creating Flow with Don Reinertsen
Why should 50% of your marketing fail?
The Resilience of PDCA
Posted by: | CommentsA few weeks ago I wrote the blog post, The Death of PDCA that stated following traditional Lean thinking leads us to focus our efforts of continuous improvement internally versus externally. Knowing my interest in the Evolution of PDCA, Karen Martin a well-regarded Lean consultant and co-author of The Kaizen Event Planner sent me Evolution of the PDCA Cycle.
The paper covers the development of PDCA from the introduction to the scientific method (you could argue between Aristotle or Galileo) to the latest development covered by the paper with the addition of the Model for Improvement published and described in The Improvement Guide. This book was published in 2009.
In reading the research paper, I discovered that somewhere along the line when the Japanese executives recast the Deming wheel at the 1950 JUSE seminar into the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle till now, we lost that all important external outlook of PDCA to one of an internally focused improvement methodology. In the book, Kaizen: The Key To Japan’s Competitive Success, Masaaki Imai shows the correlation between the Deming wheel and the PDCA cycle in Figure 5 developed at the seminar.
- Design – Plan: Product design corresponds to the planning phase of management
- Production – Do: Production corresponds to doing-making, or working on the
product that was designed - Sales – Check: Sales figures confirm whether the customer is satisfied
- Research – Action: In case of a complaint being filed, it has to be incorporated into the planning phase, and action taken for the next round of efforts
In the paper, Evolution of the PDCA Cycle, it goes on to state:
By the 1960’s the PDCA cycle in Japan had evolved into an improvement cycle and a
management tool. Lilrank and Kano state the 7 basic tools (check sheet, histograms,
Pareto chart, fishbone diagram, graphs, scatter diagrams, and stratification) highlight the
central principle of Japanese quality.
I believe that somewhere between these two points the Check stage of PDCA due to the introduction of the 7 Quality Tools became internally focused and developed along that path during the years of process improvement.
In the last decade we have evolved from the processed driven culture of the 90’s through the Customer Centric to the new culture of User Centric. The scientific method and PDCA works. As a result it adapts and evolves with time. A measure of that is the popularity of Eric Ries and the Lean Startup with the use of Build – Measure – Learn. Also the latest evolvement of Design Thinking and more specifically the Service Design field highlighted in my post, Can Service Design increase Customer demand? has established a basis for EDCA (Explore-Do-Check_Act).
In addition to our thinking, we must change our toolset. We need a complimentary toolset which was outlined in a previous post, Continuous Improvement Sales and Marketing Toolset. I am not saying that we throw away the 7 Quality Tools but we do not use them before their time. They have become more useful in the Standardization process and therefore the SDCA cycle. This is a list of the 7 basic Quality Tools to be used in SDCA:
- Cause-and-effect diagram
- Check sheet
- Control charts
- Histogram
- Pareto chart
- Scatter diagram
- Stratification
In 1976, the Union of Japanese Scientists and Engineers (JUSE) saw the need for tools to promote innovation, communicate information and successfully plan major projects. A team researched and developed the seven new quality control tools, often called the seven management and planning (MP) tools, or simply the seven management tools. This is the set that I propose to be used in PDCA:
- Affinity diagram
- Relations diagram
- Tree diagram
- Matrix diagram:
- Matrix data analysis
- Arrow diagram
- Process decision program chart (PDPC)
Today’s world has introduced more and more uncertainty. As a result it has forced us to get closer and closer to our customers. This reduces are reaction time and allows us to make better informed decisions. This methodology has been introduced to us through the concepts of Design Thinking. This is the set that I propose to be used in EDCA:
- Visualization
- Journey Mapping
- Value Chain Analysis
- Mind Mapping
- Brainstorming
- Concept Development
- Assumption Testing
- Rapid Prototyping
- Customer Co-Creation
- Learning Launch
I am not saying that tools cannot cross over into other cycles. Tools must be used as and only when needed. But through the process of defining your toolset it will assist you in understanding the cycles of continuous improvement in Lean Sales and Marketing.
So, like the possum that has adapted and survived where others have become extinct, the scientific method and PDCA will continue to evolve and live.














